Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Binary Variables
From
Clive Nicholas <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Binary Variables
Date
Wed, 2 Jun 2010 23:37:42 +0100
Natalie Trapp wrote:
> I have a problem concerning Dummy Variables.
>
> I use a Dummy Variable for 150 regions within the EU27. When I regress the
> model, I use one region as a reference group, but Stata still automatically
> omits four to five more regions. Is it maybe because the regions are too
> similar in their characteristics so that I have to build groups of similar
> regions? Or is there another way how I can do the regression with all
> regions of interest?
Your later post shows that you are using -reg-. But why not use -areg-
with the -absorb()- option? In that option you would insert one,
simple categorical regional variable.
Alternatively, why not fit your model using -xtreg- with the -i()- and
-fe- options? Your regional variable slots into the -i()- option.
The coefficients and standard errors are the same under both
approaches, as you can see at
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/xtreg.html
but your model R-squared will differ, as explained at
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/xtr2.html
--
Clive Nicholas
[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<[email protected]>. Please respond to contributions I make in
a list thread here. Thanks!]
"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/