Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: How to perform a non parametric manova
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: How to perform a non parametric manova
Date
Wed, 26 May 2010 08:12:42 -0400
"Does such a thing even exist?"
Apparently, yes. A google search of "nonparametric manova" turns up a
permutation test: Austral Ecology (2001) 26, 32–46. A new method for
non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance, by Marti J.
Anderson
The test isn't implemented in Stata. And, "nonparametric" doesn't mean
"robust". To quote the paper (p. 37): "Like its univariate
counterpart, which is sensitive to heterogeneity of variances, this
test and its predecessors that use permutations.... will also be
sensitive to differences in the dispersions of points, even if the
locations do not differ."
Steve
Steven Samuels
[email protected]
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
USA
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax: 206-202-4783
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]>
wrote: > Does such a thing even exist? For example, even
Kruskal-Wallis is a very > limited parody of -anova-. (No scope for
handling interactions so far as > I know.) >
>
> amatoallah ouchen >
> Does anyone have an idea about how to perform a non parametric manova? > an equivalent of the kruskal wallis test for anova? >
> > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/