Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: observations differ with lrtest because of interaction terms
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: observations differ with lrtest because of interaction terms
Date
Tue, 18 May 2010 23:30:13 +0200
<>
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2005-11/msg00718.html
HTH
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Meredith Carlson
Sent: Dienstag, 18. Mai 2010 23:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: observations differ with lrtest because of interaction terms
Hello Stata users,
I'm a Stata rookie, so please bear with me... I'm having problems when I run
lrtest with logistic regression to test for interaction between wealth index
and region variables. The number of observations differ, not because of
missing values, but because of the interaction terms. The model including
interaction has fewer observations because some have been dropped because of
this note...
note: _IsesXreg_3_9 != 0 predicts failure perfectly
_IsesXreg_3_9 dropped and 4 obs not used
What exactly does this note mean? What can I do to correct the number of
observations so lrtest will run?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/