Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: AW: RE: AW: recode 9, 99, 999,..., into missing
From
Amanda Fu <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: AW: RE: AW: recode 9, 99, 999,..., into missing
Date
Sun, 16 May 2010 20:33:10 -0400
Dear Mr. Weiss and Lachenbruch,
I am sorry that I should be more clear when describing my question. In
my opinion, I need to be careful about this problem : for example, for
a variable that has 10 scales, the 9 value means a real scale and 99
in that case means "not answered".
The pattern is like this:
(1) if the maximum value of a variable is smaller than 9 , then the
"not answered" takes the value 9;
(2) if the maximum value of a variable is smaller than 99 but greater
than 10, then the "not answered" takes the value 99;
(3) if the maximum value of a variable is smaller than 999 but
greater than 100, then the "not answered" takes the value 999;
and so on.
(And you are absolutely right for the reminder that there are values
such as 7,8, 98, or 97 to indicate "refused to answer" "invalid
answer". Here I would like to keep focus on one example of "not
answered" , because the other values could be dealt with using the
same way.)
Thanks for help from both of you!
Best regards,
Amanda
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/