Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Antwort: st: 'mills' output is missing for heckman regression
From
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: Antwort: st: 'mills' output is missing for heckman regression
Date
Fri, 14 May 2010 10:54:18 +0100
Not so simple:
1. -di varname- is perfectly legal and is equivalent to -di varname[1]-.
2. Clearly that is not equivalent to e.g. -list varname-.
3. But if a constant were being held in a variable, -di varname- is
sufficient to see what it is.
4. That is not especially good in terms of either style or efficiency,
but that is another story.
Nick
[email protected]
Richard Ochmann
Sent: 14 May 2010 09:21
To: [email protected]
Subject: Antwort: st: 'mills' output is missing for heckman regression
all I can see here is that at your 'problem 2' you try to -display-
variables which won't work.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/