Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: st: sort of standardization


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   AW: st: sort of standardization
Date   Wed, 12 May 2010 16:46:38 +0200

<> 

" local range=r(max)-r(min)+1"




Rich, what does the "+1" term do for the "range"? I took the definition in
my code from [R], page 204. Am I missing anything?





HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Richard
Goldstein
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Mai 2010 16:40
An: [email protected]
Cc: Ginevra Biino
Betreff: Re: st: sort of standardization

if I understand correctly what you want, I would do the following within
a -foreach- loop:

summarize variable
calculate the range from r(min) and r(max)
divide the old variable by this calculated range inside a -gen-

e.g.,

foreach var of varlist .... {
qui su `var'
local range=r(max)-r(min)+1
gen `var'3=`var'/`range'
}

Rich

On 5/12/10 10:29 AM, Ginevra Biino wrote:
> Dear Statalist,
> I have to standardize many variables (in order to run PCA).
> Besides generating the n corresponding std(varname) vars, which I have
> already done, I also want to generate n new  variables obtained dividing
> each variable by its range. Can anybody help me?
> Ginevra
>  
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index