Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: fitted values in xtmepoisson and xtpoisson
From
Dan MacNulty <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: fitted values in xtmepoisson and xtpoisson
Date
Mon, 10 May 2010 16:26:11 -0700
Dear Statalist,
According to the STATA 10 documentation re:longitudinal/panel data
(p.264) the model specified as:
xtmepoisson seizures treat lbas lbas_trt lage visit || subject:
...is equivalent to this model:
xtpoisson seizures treat lbas lbas_trt lage visit, re
Yet, the population-averaged fitted values (i.e., predictions that
include only the fixed portion of the model) appear to differ
substantially between the two models. For the xtmepoisson model, I
generated these with the post-estimation command:
predict newvar, fixedonly
For the xtpossion model, I generated the population-averaged fitted
values with the post-estimation command:
predict newvar, nu0
I'd be very grateful if someone could explain why there's an apparent
difference in the population-averaged fitted values between these two
purportedly equivalent models.
thanks,
Dan MacNulty
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/