Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | AW: st: Text size in graphs |
Date | Mon, 3 May 2010 17:23:34 +0200 |
<> One thing that we broadly agree on on the list, at least from my recollection, is that for -graph-s, dialog boxes are extremely helpful. Refining a graph design for me comes down to making "changes in the dialog box", clicking "submit", and then all over again, until I have arrived at a satisfactory solution. In my view, the graph editor is there to a) experiment, as in Tomas` case b) as a last resort for everything that you simply cannot get to work from the command line. HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Amanda Fu Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2010 17:11 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: Re: st: Text size in graphs Hi all, I also met similar problem of accommodating the legend size and position in a graph as Tomas mentioned. I found it is time-consuming and frustrating to make syntax to work out very well. Then I just used the graph editor to edit after the graph was created. So, I have a general question regrading this issue: Generally speaking, Is it worthwhile to continue testing and get some syntax that really works out and then keep this as a template for future use? Is it realistic to use graph editor to do some small enhancement by hand? Thanks for your time! Best wishes, Mandy * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/