Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: st: Text size in graphs
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
AW: st: Text size in graphs
Date
Mon, 3 May 2010 17:23:34 +0200
<>
One thing that we broadly agree on on the list, at least from my
recollection, is that for -graph-s, dialog boxes are extremely helpful.
Refining a graph design for me comes down to making "changes in the dialog
box", clicking "submit", and then all over again, until I have arrived at a
satisfactory solution. In my view, the graph editor is there to a)
experiment, as in Tomas` case b) as a last resort for everything that you
simply cannot get to work from the command line.
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Amanda Fu
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2010 17:11
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: st: Text size in graphs
Hi all,
I also met similar problem of accommodating the legend size and
position in a graph as Tomas mentioned. I found it is time-consuming
and frustrating to make syntax to work out very well. Then I just used
the graph editor to edit after the graph was created.
So, I have a general question regrading this issue:
Generally speaking, Is it worthwhile to continue testing and get some
syntax that really works out and then keep this as a template for
future use? Is it realistic to use graph editor to do some small
enhancement by hand?
Thanks for your time!
Best wishes,
Mandy
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/