Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Explaining Gamma coefficient after bioprobit command
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Explaining Gamma coefficient after bioprobit command
Date
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:21:27 +0000 (GMT)
--- On Thu, 29/4/10, Telli Anvernali Henry wrote:
> I am using the command bioprobit for my bivariate ordered
> probit regressions and I wondered if anybody can help me
> with an explanation for the estimated gamma beyond just
> the sign. I know rho measures the correlation of the error
> terms while gamma measure the actual relationship between
> equation 1 and 2 but apart from the sign of the gamma
> coefficient what can I say about the impact of the coefficient
> itself and does it matter that gamma and rho have opposite
> signs? For instance if gamma is 0.64, what can I say apart
> from "there is a strong positive correlation between depvar1
> and depvar2".
-bioprobit- is a user written command, the Statalist FAQ askes
you to say where you got it from. This is crucial because there
are often multiple versions of a user written program floating
around cyber space. This appears to be the problem here, as
my version (downloaded from SSC by typing in Stata
-ssc install bioprobit-) does not return a gamma coefficient,
so there is nothing to interpret.
-- Maarten
. which bioprobit
c:\ado\plus\b\bioprobit.ado
*! version 1.11 17Aug2007
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/