Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | RE: st: RE: create matrix from pwcorr command |
Date | Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:40:00 +0100 |
You want to take the determinant of that matrix! I'd strongly advise getting at the correlation matrix in several different ways. With that fraction of missing data you are going to end up with a distribution of estimates for that determinant in any honest assessment of uncertainty. I have no easy or specific advice beyond that. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Tyler Frazier Thank you for your reply and comment -- you are correct, the number of observations in this household survey vary from ~3400 down to ~1400 and even one or two variables are in the range of ~800. I would like to come up with the determinants in order to synthetically simulate the population of a large area of a city, approximately 200,000 persons. Should I fill in the missing values using stata first? Ty Frazier On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > I don't know why you thought that would work. It's a very long way from > the syntax for -matrix-. > > Stata makes it difficult for you to do this, and with good reason. As > different correlations may be based on different sample sizes, the > correlations are not strictly comparable, and the resulting matrix is > typically unsuitable for multivariate analysis. It may not even be > positive semi-definite. > > But that aside, -matpwcorr- from SSC evidently does this for you. > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > Tyler Frazier > > I would like to create a matrix from the pwcorr command -- I tried > > matrix m = pwcorr Var1 Var2 Var3 Var4 etc.... but that doesn't seem to > work. likewise for standard dev and mean * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/