Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
From
"Roman Kasal" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
Date
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:48:04 +0200
"nlcom _b[y2008:_cons]/_b[y2009:_cons]" really don't work for me (STATA 10.1) but "nlcom [y2008]_cons/[y2009]_cons" does
btw, don't you know why this code ends with an error?
********************
est drop _all
svyset ICO [pw=vahaHMM], strata(stk2) fpc(fpc1) singleunit(centered)
svy: mean hrMzdaMes if rok==2009
est sto r2009
svy: mean hrMzdaMes if rok==2008
est sto r2008
est dir
-------------------------------------------------------
name | command depvar npar title
-------------+-----------------------------------------
r2009 | mean no depvar 1
r2008 | mean no depvar 1
-------------------------------------------------------
suest r2009 r2008
impossible to retrieve e(b) and e(V) in r2009
****************
And does suest handle with "svy:mean x, over(y)"?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Samuels
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
You're very welcome. Either syntax works. See section 13.5 of the User's Guide.
Steve
2010/4/26 Roman Kasal <[email protected]>:
> thank you, it helps a lot!
>
> just small correction:
>
> the last command should by "nlcom [y2008]_cons/[y2009]_cons" I assume
>
> roman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Samuels
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:23 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
>
> My previous example was flawed, Because males and females could be
> present in the same PSU (famid), the degrees of freedom for -suest-
> did not equal the sum of the d.f. for the separate regressions. Here
> is another example with proper strata. Note that the degrees now add
> properly.
> Steve
>
> *************************
> webuse income, clear
> gen year = 2008 + (famid>68)
> tab year
> svyset famid, strata(year)
> svy: reg inc if year==2008
> estimates store y2008
> svy: reg inc if year==2009
> estimates store y2009
> suest y2008 y2009
> matrix list e(V) //results from different years are independent
> nlcom _b[y2008:_cons]/_b[y2009:_cons]
> ***********************************************
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Steve Samuels <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just use -suest-. Use the fact that -reg- without an argument is
>> equivalent to estimating the mean.
>>
>> ********************
>> webuse income, clear
>> svyset famid
>> svy: reg inc if male
>> estimates store Male
>> svy: reg inc if !male
>> estimates store Female
>> suest Male Female
>> nlcom _b[Male:_cons]/_b[Female:_cons]
>> *************************
>> Steve
>>
>> 2010/4/23 Roman Kasal <[email protected]>:
>>> yes, the year is another survey (different time; the years cannot be pooled because of degrees of freedom) and is included in strata.
>>>
>>> so there is no solution for this case? just manually?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Samuels
>>> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:32 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
>>>
>>>> "svy: mean wage, over(year)" is not equal "svy: mean wage if year==2009"
>>>
>>> The "if statement" is incorrect, unless year was a stratification
>>> variable that you identified to Stata.
>>>
>>> -nlcom- after -svy: mean-, over(year), is the proper approach.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/4/23 Roman Kasal <[email protected]>:
>>>> ok, for this purpose I agree, that is ok...but what about if I want to calculate SE of Mean in years 2009 and 2008 and then ratio with SE of the means?
>>>>
>>>> the problem is that CI of
>>>> "svy: mean wage, over(year)" is not equal "svy: mean wage if year==2009"
>>>> for the year 2009 because of different degrees of freedom (SE's are equal), the first command gives wrong CI.
>>>>
>>>> is any elegant solution to handle this in Stata with "nlcom" or do I have to calculate it manually?
>>>>
>>>> thank you
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Samuels
>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:08 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
>>>>
>>>> The degrees of freedom are correct. See any sampling text.
>>>>
>>>> Briefly: To identify a subpopulation, each observation in the sample
>>>> receives a 0-1 indicator variable d. If X is the numerator variable
>>>> and Y is the denominator variable, the numerator for the ratio of is
>>>> the sum *over the entire sample* of Z_x = d *X and the denominator is
>>>> the sum of Z_y = d * Y. The standard errors are based on variability
>>>> in the Z's, including the zero values.
>>>> By the way, the standard errors formulas are valid only if the
>>>> expected number of observations in a subpopulation is at least 20.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>> 2010/4/22 Roman Kasal <[email protected]>:
>>>>> thank you for the code, but I have found a problem:
>>>>>
>>>>> if I calculate over(foreign) the bound are enumerated with "e(N_psu)-e(N_strata)" degrees of freedom, but not for each foreign (degrees of freedom are for whole dataset) and this is wrong I assume.
>>>>>
>>>>> thank you
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Samuels
>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 2:58 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
>>>>>
>>>>> Roman
>>>>> Perhaps we misunderstand what you are asking for. I We have been
>>>>> assuming that you want the ratio of the means of two variables
>>>>> ("columns"?) measured possibly on the same person. Perhaps you want
>>>>> the ratio of the means of one variable for two subpopulations. Both
>>>>> analyses will ignore missing values.
>>>>>
>>>>> If this is not what you desire, then please demonstrate by hand what
>>>>> you do want on a small, non-survey data set.. Also I'd like to know
>>>>> which R function does what are asking for
>>>>>
>>>>> The following do file computes the ratio of means with CI and then
>>>>> does the same for the log ratio and transforms to the original scale.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **************************CODE BEGINS**************************
>>>>> capture program drop _all
>>>>> program antilog
>>>>> local lparm el(r(b),1,1)
>>>>> local se sqrt(el(r(V),1,1))
>>>>> local bound invttail(e(df_r),.025)*`se'
>>>>> local parm exp(`lparm')
>>>>> local ll exp(`lparm' - `bound')
>>>>> local ul exp( `lparm' + `bound')
>>>>> di "parm =" `parm' " ll = " `ll' " ul = " `ul'
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>> sysuse auto, clear
>>>>> svyset _n
>>>>> svy: mean mpg, over(foreign)
>>>>> nlcom (myratio1: _b[Domestic]/_b[Foreign]) //ratio
>>>>> nlcom (myratio2: log(_b[Domestic]/_b[Foreign])) // log ratio
>>>>> // Confidence interval of last -nlcom- on antilog scale
>>>>> antilog
>>>>> ***************************CODE ENDS***************************
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Roman Kasal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> I don't agree...so how to do it when you want to find out ratio between
>>>>>> years, male X female, ...? So there is no solution? Just to keep N,mean,
>>>>>> SE, degrees of freedom, N_strata, N_psu, .... and calculate it manually?
>>>>>> I think it is not appropriate solution, at least to have it as an
>>>>>> option. I think there is missing a lot with complex survey in Stata and
>>>>>> complex survey is needed for almost every survey research, even freeware
>>>>>> R-project is better equipped :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so have a hope Stata will get it soon....immediately we are buying it
>>>>>> again :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And it should. Data (x,y) (1,2) (2,4) (3,6) (100,.) will give an
>>>>>> entirely different view of the data if the unpaired observation is
>>>>>> included in a mean or ratio calculation. Or consider data with x
>>>>>> missing in half the pairs and y missing in the other half; the ratio
>>>>>> of means would be meaningless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The formulas for standard errors for ratios assume that the data are
>>>>>> paired. Formally, they are based on the residual MSE of a regression
>>>>>> of y on x through the origin. You cannot do that regression with
>>>>>> unpaired data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If your concern is missing data, the solution is to impute the missing
>>>>>> values before analysis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Steven Samuels
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 18 Cantine's Island
>>>>> Saugerties NY 12477
>>>>> USA
>>>>> Voice: 845-246-0774
>>>>> Fax: 206-202-4783
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steven Samuels
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 18 Cantine's Island
>>>> Saugerties NY 12477
>>>> USA
>>>> Voice: 845-246-0774
>>>> Fax: 206-202-4783
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steven Samuels
>>> [email protected]
>>> 18 Cantine's Island
>>> Saugerties NY 12477
>>> USA
>>> Voice: 845-246-0774
>>> Fax: 206-202-4783
>>>
>>> *
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>
>>> *
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steven Samuels
>> [email protected]
>> 18 Cantine's Island
>> Saugerties NY 12477
>> USA
>> Voice: 845-246-0774
>> Fax: 206-202-4783
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steven Samuels
> [email protected]
> 18 Cantine's Island
> Saugerties NY 12477
> USA
> Voice: 845-246-0774
> Fax: 206-202-4783
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Steven Samuels
[email protected]
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
USA
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax: 206-202-4783
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/