Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Heteroskedastic Probit Model
From
Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Heteroskedastic Probit Model
Date
Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:07:49 -0500
At 02:54 PM 4/22/2010, Richard Williams wrote:
True, but if you just throw up your hands and say you will assume no
hetero, that has problems too. You may get estimates that are
misleading, particularly if, say, you are interested in things like
group comparisons of effects. If you have a theoretically plausible
model, you can test whether the variables in the variance equation
have significant effects. Alas, if the model is wrong that can also
lead to incorrect conclusions. But you're taking a risk whatever
you do, so you should think about what makes most sense while
realizing that other things may make sense too.
Also, the rough information becomes less rough if you have ordinal
variables, because ordinal variables convey more information about
the underlying latent variable.
I tossed this out quickly the other day and i thought I should
elaborate. Binary dependent variables have been shown to have lots
of problems in a heteroskedastic probit model, even if the model is
correctly specified. As Maarten says, such variables convey only
limited information about the underlying Y*. Simulation studies,
however, indicate that ordinal variables convey more information and
fare much better in a heteroskedastic model. For a discussion, see
http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/oglm/RW_Hetero_Choice.pdf
(or else go to the May 2009 Sociological Methods and Research where
the final paper was published). The paper also elaborates on why a
bad hetero model can be worse than a model that just ignores
heteroskedasticity.
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/