Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: gllamm or SVY
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: gllamm or SVY
Date
Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:22:42 -0400
Irene,
In Stata, -gllamm- is your only choice right now. Stata's -xt-
commands do not accept the -svy- prefix or probability weights.
-gllamm- accepts probability weights and a cluster variable, but not
strata. If you use -gllamm- you will have standard errors that are
too large, but this can be mitigated, if you have few countries, by
including country as a fixed-effect predictor rather than as the
highest-level random effect,
Steve
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Irene Moral <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm analysing a sample drawn from a stratified cluster designed study.
>
> In my study, I considered countries as strata, health centers in each
> country as clusters and then patients are selected within each cluster.
>
> I'm using the svyset and all the svy commands to define the sample design
> and to run analysis, but some people asked me about using multilevel
> analysis instead of svy.
>
> I have understood that other options are to use the gllamm command or to
> panel data as longitudinal and use xt commands, żit is true?
>
> can anybody explain in which cases is more useful to use one than the other?
> or what type of errors am I exposed to when using svy?
>
> thanks in advance
>
> Irene
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Steven Samuels
[email protected]
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
USA
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax: 206-202-4783
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/