AW: st: AW: changes in -xi: xtmixed- command from Stata 10 to 11

["Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>]

<> 

Ok, additional behind the scenes chatter with Maarten Buis indicates to me
that the majority of users have no problem here, apart myself and Bob
Ploutz-Snyder.


HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Kit Baum
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. April 2010 16:00
An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Betreff: re: st: AW: changes in -xi: xtmixed- command from Stata 10 to 11

<>
Like Scott Merryman, I have no problem with the xtmepoisson command, using
Stata/11 MP (64-bit Intel) born 20Apr2010. It converges rapidly whether you
use uv and uv2 or c.uv and c.uv#c.uv in the command line. 

Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |
http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
                              An Introduction to Stata Programming  |
http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
   An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |
http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/