Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: AW: the convenient way to exclude part of the do file from running
From
Rodolphe Desbordes <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: AW: the convenient way to exclude part of the do file from running
Date
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:21:50 +0100
A much less elegant way would be to use -exit-.
Rodolphe
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Weiss
Sent: mardi 20 avril 2010 16:14
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: AW: the convenient way to exclude part of the do file from running
<>
" Therefore, I would like to find if there is any better way to exclude some part of the commands from running."
For huge do-files, highlighting the relevant lines is not an option, but you can have a main do-file, and call sub-do-files from there. This has the side effect that it forces you to think about logical chunks of your problem that could be allocated into one of those sub-do-files...
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Amanda Fu
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. April 2010 17:07
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: the convenient way to exclude part of the do file from running
Hi all,
I was wondering if there is any more convenient way to exclude some part of the do file from running in the process of writing and revising a do file.
For example, I am working on a do file with 1000 lines of commands, in which I would like to exclude the bottom 100 lines from running and checking. I have not decided if I should permanently delete the 100 lines from this do file or not.
Currently what I deal with this is just using mouse to select the parts that I want to check and run. When I have to run a couple of times, this using-mouse-to-select becomes tedious. Another way is to add * or /* before those excluded lines. I do not like this way since when finally I want to include these commands, I have to delete those symbols. Therefore, I would like to find if there is any better way to exclude some part of the commands from running.
Thanks for your help!
Mandy
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/