Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: AW: RE: RE: variable labels and reshape--reinserting en masse
From
<[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: AW: RE: RE: variable labels and reshape--reinserting en masse
Date
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:04:04 +0200
> The syntax looks neat, compared with today`s requirements of opening
braces
not followed by anything, and closing braces demanding a line of their
own
:-)
Martin, you're walking on very thin ice... ;-))
Whatever you do: "Don't mention the for"
***
For - ups, sorry, I'll start again:
By myself with the help of Dr. Cox and others I have overcome my
"addiction" using it in do-files.
But I use it on the command line sometimes so I'm not totally clean.
I personal think that the idea of one-liner-loops including parallel
lists is still a good one.
A successor that overcomes some of the limitations discussed be???e and
uses locals instead of capital letters
would be a nice addition to the Stata toolbox.
Best wishes
Stefan
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/