Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: AW: Reorganization of pael data
From
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: AW: Reorganization of pael data
Date
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:29:52 -0400
I'm sorry; I didn't know that. I just started to work with data.
I tried it with max this time, it worked out. So thanks a lot!!
Mareike
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, Apr 14, 2010 7:21 pm
Subject: RE: st: AW: Reorganization of pael data
Here it comes:
"The current version of Stata is 11. Please specify if you are using an
earlier
version; otherwise, the answer to your question is likely to refer to
commands
or features unavailable to you."
(http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/statalist.html#stata)
-- and, it might well be added, lead to wasting your time and that of
others.
(max) rather than (firstnm) will probably serve in your case.
Nick
[email protected]
[email protected]
No, double checked the spelling. Maybe the reason is that I'm working
wih an older version of Stata (version 9.2) which doesn't know "firstnm"
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/