Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: AKAIKE formula
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: AKAIKE formula
Date
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Tue, 13/4/10, Paulo Regis wrote:
> Now, what if the issue involves nested models in a panel.
> Model A:
>
> Y = B X + e
>
> Then, we have the "nested" model B
>
> Y = B X +c Y(-1) + e
>
> if Y(-1) were any variable, no problem: the t-statistic.
> However, there is endogeneity and now i have that i need
> to use IV. That is the reason I wanted to use AIC.
>
> Actually, I made the two mdoels very simple. I add other
> variables in addition to Y(-1) so I should look at the
> F-statistic or a fit measure.
I am afraid I do not understand the question. It looks like
you are trying to test something, but what is the null
hypothesis that you are trying to test?
-- Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/