Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: RE: HLM vs. Stata for multilevel modeling
From
"Lachenbruch, Peter" <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: RE: HLM vs. Stata for multilevel modeling
Date
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:25:34 -0700
In browsing some of the reviews, they are based on old products - there may be newer ones and the reviewers haven't revised their reviews. EGRET is based on a 2000 version - I don't know if it's been updated, etc.
Tony
Peter A. Lachenbruch
Department of Public Health
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97330
Phone: 541-737-3832
FAX: 541-737-4001
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulrich Kohler
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: RE: HLM vs. Stata for multilevel modeling
But note that the review on Stata there is on Stata 8. This is not quite
up to date I would say.
Uli
Am Montag, den 12.04.2010, 15:52 +0200 schrieb Russel Wildeman:
> Rosie,
>
> You can go to the Centre for Multilevel Modelling at the University of
> Bristol in the UK (just Google it). Comparisons were done across a range of
> programmes using multilevel models.
>
> HTH,
> Russell
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rosie Chen
> Sent: 12 April 2010 03:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: HLM vs. Stata for multilevel modeling
>
> Dear all,
>
> Do you know if any reference has compared the use of HLMand Stata for
> multilevel modeling? I have been using HLM software for
> multilevel analysis, but it seems to me that Stata has more functions than
> HLM (e.g., calculating predicted probability). I wonder what are
> the advantages and disadvantages of using HLM compared with Stata in
> multilevel modeling?
>
> In addition, one of my studies will utilize discrete-time multilevel
> analysis method (a combination of survival analysis and multilevel
> modeling), so how do these two software compare in terms of accommodating
> this analytic method? I will consider earning to use Stata for such an
> analysis if Stata is good for this purpose.
>
> Any thoughts and suggestions are appreciated. Thank you very much!!
>
> Rosie
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/