Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: RE: PCSE |
Date | Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:06:29 +0100 |
-rvfplot2- from the -modeldiag- package is more forgiving than official -rvfplot-. I've not tested it with -xtpcse- it is that you used, but it may help. Install from the SJ archives. That is, -search modeldiag- in an updated Stata and get the files for gr0009_1 as below. SJ-10-1 gr0009_1 . . . . Software update for model diagnostic graph commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox (help anovaplot, indexplot, modeldiag, ofrtplot, ovfplot, qfrplot, racplot, rdplot, regplot, rhetplot, rvfplot2, rvlrplot, rvpplot2 if installed) Q1/10 SJ 10(1):164 provides new command rbinplot for plotting means or medians of residuals by bins; provides new options for smoothing using restricted cubic splines; updates anova examples On adjusted R-square, what would be the adjustment? These single-number figures of merit are usually not much use anyway.... Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk dan sobovitz I would very much appreciate some assistance on panel-correlated standard errors PCSE regression. Is there a reason that when running a PCSE regression I only get the R squared and not the adjusted R squared? And also, is there a way to get the RVF plot afterwords? The regular command (rvfplot which I use after reg doesn't seem to work now that I use xtpcse). * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/