Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: suest after ivregress or ivreg2
From
richard boylan <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: suest after ivregress or ivreg2
Date
Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:45:03 -0500
No mention of suest, but one can predict scores which seems to suggest
that one should be able to use suest.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Martin Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> <>
> Look at the relevant postestimation help file to see whether -suest- is supported.
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
> -original message-
> Subject: st: suest after ivregress or ivreg2
> From: richard boylan <[email protected]>
> Date: 07-04-2010 21:15
>
> I am trying to use suest after ivregress or ivreg2.
>
> I saw two answers both posted in 2009.
>
> The first one
> http://n2.nabble.com/st-Wald-test-across-equations-after-ivregress-or-ivreg2-td3312229.html
> just didn't work when I tried to replicate it.
>
> The second one
> http://n2.nabble.com/st-Compare-ivreg-coefficients-across-models-td4077316.html
> I wasn't sure if it was right nor not.
>
> I am just wondering if anyone had further insights since those postings.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/