Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: ivreg2 cannot produce first-stage result
From
Mo Phil <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: ivreg2 cannot produce first-stage result
Date
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:24:53 +0800
Dear All,
I used the following ivreg2 to estimate an IV-regression, but could
not produce the first-stage result.
. ivreg2 my_y $xfirm $year_dummies choice_dummy (= choice_sic3), first
Unable to display first-stage estimates; macro e(first) is missing
Unable to display summary of first-stage estimates; macro e(first) is missing
I browsed the Statalist, found a similiar posting, but the suggested
answer is that if OLS is used in the second stage, there is no
first-stage results.
But I actually used the same command syntax in another setting some
months ago, it worked.
I would appreciated any suggestions on how to obtain the first stage result.
Thanks
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Alemu Mekonnen
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 1:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: A question about ivreg2
>
> Dear Statalisters,
>
> When I run ivreg2, I am not able to get the first-stage
> estimates even if I specify 'first' or 'ffirst' in the do
> file I am using (I do see OLS estimation for the second
> stage, though).
If you're using OLS in the second stage, then you have no endogenous
regressors. This means there is no first stage, which explains why
ivreg2 does't report them.
Cheers,
Mark
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/