Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: using varlist wildcards in anova
From
Vineet Bhagwat <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: using varlist wildcards in anova
Date
Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:45:45 -0400
Thanks Phil!
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Phil Schumm <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2010, at 6:25 PM, Phil Schumm wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Vineet Bhagwat wrote:
>>>
>>> Which is weird, because on my computer's Stata, "reg y t* " and any other
>>> command using the asterisk works fine, just -anova- that seems to throw the
>>> error for some reason. I'm using Stata9 on my computer if that clarifies
>>> anything.
>>
>>
>> Well, at least that narrows it down. I no longer have a version of Stata
>> 9 on my machine, so I can't look at this issue further. Perhaps someone
>> with Stata 9 still available (or a better memory of -anova- under version 9)
>> might be able to add something.
>>
>> One workaround would be the following (IIRC, -unab- predated Stata 9):
>>
>> unab t: t*
>> anova y `t'
>>
>> though upgrading, if possible, would clearly be preferable.
>
>
> Ok, I must confess that this made me a bit curious, especially since my
> previous statement
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Phil Schumm wrote:
>>
>> Regardless, this isn't due to -anova-, but rather is a function of how
>> Stata is parsing the command line.
>
>
> was clearly incorrect (I also misspoke when I said "parsing the command
> line" -- what I should have said was "expanding the varlist"). Instead,
> this *does* have to do with -anova-'s syntax. I pulled an old copy of Stata
> 9, and sure enough, I get exactly the behavior Vineet describes.
>
> Unfortunately, in Stata 9 -anova- was a built-in command, so we can't look
> at the source. However, the syntax diagram
>
> anova varname [term [/] [term [/] ...]] [if] [in] [weight] [,
> options]
>
> where term is of the form varname[{*||}varname[...]]
>
> suggests that -anova- was using its own approach to interpret the list of
> model terms, and although one could specify a model as a simple list of
> variables, -anova- under Stata 9 evidently didn't support varname globbing.
>
> In sum, the workaround I gave above is your only option under Stata 9.
>
>
> -- Phil
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/