Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Roman Kasal" <kasal@trexima.cz> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: RE: AW: ratio function |
Date | Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:07:28 +0200 |
thanks for replay, but it ignores unpaired data :( -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Martin Weiss Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:05 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: AW: ratio function <> So you want the ratio of means and se, but that seems to be exactly what -ratio- gives you: ************* webuse highschool, clear svyset svy: ratio height/weight quietly svy: mean height weight nlcom (myratio: _b[height]/_b[weight]) ************* HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Roman Kasal Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. April 2010 13:58 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: st: ratio function dear Sir/Madam How to come around command like this? svy: mean(columnA)/mean(columnB) I would like to estimate ratio of means and its standard error. How is it possible with STATA? It is strange that function "ratio" takes into account just pairs....but why when "ratio" divides whole mean(columnA)/mean(columnB)? Why the function ignores missing values? In real life is very improbable that I have perfect paired variables. thank you Roman Kasal * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/