Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: about qvf
From
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: about qvf
Date
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:55:34 +0100
My guess is that you are doing nothing wrong. -qvf- is a user-written
command, as a complete question would have made clear. I don't think
-qvf- is being maintained by its original authors and I don't think
there was either a claim that -qvf- matched -glm- detail for detail. In
short, it looks as if you want -qvf- to do something it does not
support.
Nick
[email protected]
Arina Viseth
I am using glm to run a fractional logit regression: the command I am
using is, glm y x1 x2 x3, family(binomial) link(logit) robust. y is my
fractional dependant variable.
I would like to control for the possible endogeneity of one of my
regressor, x1, using qvf and instrumental variable t1. However when I
type qvf y x1 x2 x3 (t1 x2 x3), I have the message "y not 0/1 for
Bernoulli model".
May I please ask for your help/suggestion on what I am doing wrong here?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/