Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: st: AW: Simulate stepwise: Report coefficients from each replication
From
John Antonakis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: AW: st: AW: Simulate stepwise: Report coefficients from each replication
Date
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:37:33 +0200
Hi:
Oh...OK. Thanks for the tip with gen byte....
As for the interaction between the two seeds--I suppose that I should
just have one seed--in the simulate command, right?
Best,
J.
____________________________________________________
Prof. John Antonakis, Associate Dean
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
Faculty page:
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Personal page:
http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis
____________________________________________________
On 29.03.2010 17:31, Martin Weiss wrote:
<>
What is your complaint, BTW? You get a red cross marker from -simulate-
whenever one of the coefficients was dropped by -stepwise-. Which makes
sense to me.
What is " x1_count" and sister variable good for in your -program-?
The high/low variables can be created as one-liners:
*************
gen byte x1_high= _n > 177
*************
Have you thought about the interaction between the two -seed-s that you set?
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von John Antonakis
Gesendet: Montag, 29. März 2010 17:07
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: st: AW: Simulate stepwise: Report coefficients from each
replication
Sorry....I took bits out of some older code....in fact, the program is
the following (where I want to show that stepwise gives nonsense
findings, particularly when analyzing data within extreme
groups--believe me, people do this and I am commenting on a paper that
just did it)--I will run the below four times for each group (though
with a bit of programming I guess it is possible to run it one):
clear
set seed 51
capture program drop sim
version 10.1
program define sim, eclass
drop _all
set obs 272
gen x1=rnormal()
gen x2=rnormal() +.2*x1
gen x3=rnormal() +.3*x1 + .3*x2
gen x4=rnormal() +.2*x1
gen x5=rnormal()
gen x6=rnormal() + .2*x5
gen x7=rnormal() + .5*x5
gen x8=rnormal() + .1*x7
gen x9=rnormal() + .1*x7
generate double e = 5*rnormal()
generate double u = sqrt(exp(-2+0.6*x1))*e
gen y = 5+ x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8+x9 + 2*u
reg y x*
sort x1
gen x1_count=_n
gen x1_high=1 if _n > 177
replace x1_high=0 if _n <178
gen x1_low=1 if _n < 96
replace x1_low=0 if _n>95
sort x2
gen x2_count=_n
gen x2_high=1 if _n > 177
replace x2_high=0 if _n <178
gen x2_low=1 if _n < 96
replace x2_low=0 if _n>95
gen group="high_high" if x1_high==1 & x2_high==1
replace group="low_low" if x1_low==1 & x2_low==1
replace group="low_high" if x1_low==1 & x2_high==1
replace group="high_low" if x1_high==1 & x2_low==1
stepwise, pr(.2): reg y x1-x9 if group=="low_low"
end
simulate _b _se, reps(20) seed (123) : sim,
Best,
J.
____________________________________________________
Prof. John Antonakis, Associate Dean
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
Faculty page:
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Personal page:
http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis
____________________________________________________
On 29.03.2010 17:02, Martin Weiss wrote:
<>
Where exactly do you define -program- "sim"? -simulate- expects a command
after the colon, remember...
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von John
Antonakis
Gesendet: Montag, 29. März 2010 16:56
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: Simulate stepwise: Report coefficients from each replication
I want to highlight the evils of stepwise analysis. However, I am having
problems in getting Stata to report the coefficients from each
replication --it seems that it only reports the coefficients that are
common across replications. Anyone have any ideas?
clear
set seed 51
drop _all
set obs 272
gen x1=rnormal()
gen x2=rnormal() +.2*x1
gen x3=rnormal() +.3*x1 + .3*x2
gen x4=rnormal() +.2*x1
gen x5=rnormal()
gen x6=rnormal() + .2*x5
gen x7=rnormal() + .5*x5
gen x8=rnormal() + .1*x7
gen x9=rnormal() + .1*x7
generate double e = 5*rnormal()
generate double u = sqrt(exp(-2+0.6*x1))*e
gen y = 5+ x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8+x9 + 2*u
stepwise, pr(.2): reg y x1-x9
end
simulate _b _se, reps(20) seed (123) : sim,
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/