Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: is gllamm appropriate? is it necessary?-more information
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: is gllamm appropriate? is it necessary?-more information
Date
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Wed, 17/3/10, Jessica Bishop-Royse wrote:
<snip>
> 3. As of now, my cause of death variable is 10
> categories, 9 causes and survival.
<snip>
> . gllamm causeofdeath black biryear, i(countynumber)
If causeofdeath is categorical than at least you should specify the
-link()- and -family()- options as now you modeling the "mean cause
of death" and since the coding of such categorical variables is
arbitrary the resulting means are meaningless.
One thing you can try to make -gllamm- converge (and make the results
easier to interpret, especially with interactions) is to center the
variables, or at least make sure that each variable is 0 at some
meaningfull value within the range of your variable , e.g. substract
50 from age to make sure that the constant refers to 50 year olds
rather than newly born babies. Year of birth is absolutely notorious,
if you do not center the variable, the constant will refer to the
year 0, which is usually way way way outside the range of the data.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/