Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Neal Beck <nealinmadrid@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: xtmelogit vs hlm |
| Date | Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:32:04 +0100 |
As OP, turns out that on RTFMing I can easily get HLM and xtmelogit to within 10%, quite good enough for govt work given the differing numerical methods. Why Stata thinks that I might (as a default) want to estimate a mixed model with the random coefficient centered on 0 (that is, no fixed component entered automatically) is well beyond me. But not reading the FM is not a good excuse for assuming that all Stata syntax looks like R syntax (mutatis mutandis). Sorry. Neal Neal Beck On leave AY 2009 at the Instituto Juan March, Madrid Spain * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/