Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis
From
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis
Date
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:31:13 -0000
The best way to apologise is to give it.... Still tua culpa, if not tua
maxima culpa.
Nick
[email protected]
Ricardo Ovaldia
Thank you Nick.
I am sorry for not providing the full reference. mea culpa.
-- On Mon, 3/15/10, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
> Subject: st: RE: Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 11:22 AM
> . findit Kruskal
>
> turns up what there is. -findit- is a variant on -search-,
> recommended
> to you in the last thread you started.
>
> Minimal name (year) references are deprecated on this list.
> But the
> procedure recommended in that book is almost certainly
> highly
> programmable.
Ricardo Ovaldia
> Is there a Post-Hoc test for Kruskal Wallis in Stata?
> Something like the one proposed by Sokal and Rohlf (1995).
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/