Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: re: st: Simple regression and Multiple regression?
From
Kit Baum <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
re: re: st: Simple regression and Multiple regression?
Date
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:32:07 -0400
<>
Rose said
By the way,"Frisch-Waugh-Lovell theorem says that the coefficient of turn should be the same in multiple regression or in a regression
of price on turn, with the effects of other regressors partialled-off from both." In Woodbridge's book, the effect of other regressors is only partialled-off from the concerned regressor, not from the dependent variable.
It is also OK, right?
What I tried in stata told me it was OK.
No, if you fail to partia-offl the other regressors from the dependent variable, you get the same point estimate but a different standard error, t-stat, , R^2, RMS Error, etc. Check the example I gave for
reg epsp epst
versus the regression
reg price epst
You will see that they are not the same.
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/