Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: is gllamm appropriate? is it necessary?
From
Jessica Bishop-Royse <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: is gllamm appropriate? is it necessary?
Date
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:23:43 -0500
Hello Statalisters! Hope you're having a wonderful weekend.
I have a small question regarding multilevel modeling.
I am working with a dataset with over 300,000 observations for two years of
data. I am trying to model a 9 category nominal dependent variable (cause
of death), my independent variables (there are 14, which are continuous and
dichotmous) as well as 6 county level indicators.
My question this: is this best done with gllamm? Does anyone have any
other suggestions for a more appropriate model? Or perhaps a suggestion as
to how to speed this up?
Any help or suggestions are much appreciated!
Thanks so much, in advance.
Jessi Bishop-Royse
--
Jessi Bishop-Royse
http://sites.google.com/site/wakullagirlssoccer/
http://sites.google.com/site/jessicacbishoproyse/Home
"Without a struggle, there can be no progress."
Fredrick Douglass
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/