Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Neal Beck <nealinmadrid@gmail.com> |
To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | Re: st: Blups after xtmixed/xtmelogit |
Date | Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:16:46 +0100 |
Gracias From Neal's Touch in MadridEl 11/03/2010, a las 05:11 p.m., Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> escribió:
--- On Thu, 11/3/10, Neal Beck wrote:Using most recent S11, I am looking for an easy way (stress easy way) to produce nice output of blups with their se's.I think the trick is not to think of these predictions as matrices or vectors, but instead as variables (temporarily) added to your dataset.See for example the example below: *----------------- begin example ------------------ webuse pig, clear xtmixed weight week || id: predict b*, reffects predict se*, reses bys id (b1): keep if _n == 1 gen lb = b1 - invnormal(0.975)*se1 gen ub = b1 + invnormal(0.975)*se1 sort b1 gen x = _n labmask x, values(id) label variable x "id" twoway rcap lb ub x || /// scatter b1 x, /// mlab(id) mlabpos(0) msymbol(none) /// xlabel(1/48, val angle(vertical)) /// legend(order(2 "blup" /// 1 "95% conf. int.")) /// xsize(7) *---------------- end example ------------------- -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/