Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: programming error with -generate-
From
"Visintainer, Paul" <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: programming error with -generate-
Date
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 08:27:57 -0500
Thanks, all, for the help. It was really instructive (and fun). I guess it is just another example of a mere mortal straying into the "twilight zone" of hexadecimal. (I wonder if Rosetta Stone offers this as one of its "foreign languages" . . .)
-p
___________________________________
Paul F. Visintainer, PhD
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, MA 01199
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Weiss
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: AW: st: programming error with -generate-
<>
Even more optimistic take on last night: The speed with which we tackled
this mystery was extremely high:
| 15:40:22 |<- initial post
| 15:50:10 |
| 15:50:10 |
| 15:50:10 |
| 16:00:09 |
|----------|
| 16:00:09 |
| 16:00:12 |
| 16:00:12 |
| 16:10:07 |
| 16:10:07 |
|----------|
| 16:10:08 |
| 16:20:30 |
| 16:20:30 |
| 16:30:05 |
| 16:40:12 |
|----------|
| 16:40:14 |
| 16:40:15 |
| 16:50:37 |
| 16:50:37 |
| 17:00:16 |
|----------|
| 17:00:16 |
| 17:10:07 |
| 17:10:07 |
| 17:20:05 |
| 17:20:05
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Nick Cox
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. März 2010 11:01
An: [email protected]
Betreff: RE: st: programming error with -generate-
Like Martin Weiss, I think this advice is a little too alarmist. Note
that -twoway function- requires reference to -x- as generic argument.
The thread so far has shown various things. The pessimistic take is that
several people who are experienced users and who should have read the
manual failed to spot something that is a logical consequence of
documented behaviour. (Anyone who did spot it may have had to look
twice, or thrice, to work out what was going wrong, but no matter. This
is not all a quiz against the clock.)
The optimistic take, which I much prefer, is that several such people
have never been bitten by this possible but fairly unusual situation.
It's probably worth a one-page Tip in the Journal, however.
Nick
[email protected]
Visintainer, Paul
I think I'm beginning to understand. My concern is that x is such a
generic variable name used by most of us for programming equations.
Perhaps because of its relation to hexadecimal formats, we should just
avoid using it when programming.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender immediately or by telephone at (413) 794-0000 and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. For further information regarding Baystate Health's privacy policy, please visit our Internet web site at http://www.baystatehealth.com.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/