Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Misha Spisok <misha.spisok@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: Marginal effects with natural log of independent variable |
| Date | Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:12:00 -0800 |
Yeah, you're right; x_ij does appear in p_ij. I had in mind that p_ij was sitting there, already calculated. Maybe a better way to express my concern is that I'm interested in the change in p_ij due to a change in x_ij, not due to a change in ln(x_ij). Thanks. Misha On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote: > Misha Spisok <misha.spisok@gmail.com> : > > p_ij is a function of x_ij, so it does appear, right? > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Misha Spisok <misha.spisok@gmail.com> wrote: >> One benefit I see is that the variable, x_ij, doesn't appear in this >> expression. > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/