Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: bivariate probit using -gllamm- |
Date | Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:26:30 -0600 |
Why do you want to use -gllamm- for this? -biprobit- should be way faster. It is probably doable, but you would need to impose some odd constraints like unit loadings of the common latent variable in both equations. On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Dimitrije Tišma <dimitrijetisma@gmail.com>wrote: > I was wondering if it is possible to do a bivariate probit regression > using -gllamm- rather than the built-in comman -biprobit-. If yes, > what would be the basic syntax? I have looked up everywhere (or at > least I think I did), -gllamm- manual included, but haven´t found a > lot on this. Thanks! > -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/