Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |
| To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | st: AW: Why my codes run well on version 9.1 but not on version 10 |
| Date | Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:52:06 +0100 |
<> Which variables are dropped? Are there any string variables in the -varlist- fed to -recode-? Type - ds, has(type string)- to find out conveniently. If so, what do you want -recode- to do to them?... HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Quang Nguyen Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 13:39 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: st: Why my codes run well on version 9.1 but not on version 10 Dear all: We have a small program which run well on Stata version 9.1. However, when we run it on Stata/SE 10, there is a message like " recode only runs with numeric variable". We check and find that Stata just automatically drop some variables in the in-between steps. This happens as we run the program as a whole. If we run the program comand by comand it works well. Do you know wht amight cause this, and what is the solution. Many thanks! -- "My father gave me the greatest gift anyone could give another person, he believed in me." - Jim Valvano * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/