Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: re: sample by() vs. bysort: sample; and some unexpected ssc install
From
Kit Baum <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: re: sample by() vs. bysort: sample; and some unexpected ssc install
Date
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:42:15 -0500
<>
Gabi said
mm_sample() from -moremata- is required; type ssc install moremata
r(499);
end of do-file
r(499);
Yet I do have moremata. I checked:
. ssc install moremata
checking moremata consistency and verifying not already installed...
all files already exist and are up to date.
.
Has anybody seen this kind of phantom ssc installs before? How did you
fix yours?
After you install a SSC package containing a Mata object library, you must reindex the list of Mata libraries before the library from the newly-installed package becomes available. Do this by:
(1) quit Stata and start it again, which will create the proper index, or
(2) issue command
mata: mata mlib index
which will do it during the current Stata session.
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/