Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE:RE: AW: marginal effects after ssm command
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE:RE: AW: marginal effects after ssm command
Date
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:01:39 -0800 (PST)
--- On Mon, 15/2/10, Arantza Ugidos wrote:
> We do not know where the error may be. With other commands
> mfx works fine. But after ssm it does not return marginal
> effects but the estimated coefficients again.
-mfx- looks at the default -predict- function that is
associated with a command, which should be left behind in
e(predict). If e(predict) is empty then -mfx- looks by default
at the change in the linear prediction, which is what you
found. Since -ssm- is a wrapper for -gllamm- the authors
apperently did not think it would be a good idea to provide
such a predict function. Instead, they say in the help file:
"-gllamm- itself should be used to extend the model and for
prediction and simulation using -gllapred- or -gllasim-".
The problem is that -mfx- won't work with -gllapred-, so
you'll probably need to derive the marginal effects yourself.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/