|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: -senspec- interpretation question
I have cut and pasted Michael's program, and have run it. It seems to run OK, but I am not clear what Michael's query is.
If I run Michael's program, and then type, in Stata,
tab test disease if method==1, row
then the result is:
**** BEGINNING OF Stata LOG - CUT HERE
+----------------+
| Key |
|----------------|
| frequency |
| row percentage |
+----------------+
| disease
test | 0 1 | Total
-----------+----------------------+----------
0 | 46 121 | 167
| 27.54 72.46 | 100.00
-----------+----------------------+----------
1 | 212 128 | 340
| 62.35 37.65 | 100.00
-----------+----------------------+----------
Total | 258 249 | 507
| 50.89 49.11 | 100.00
**** END OF Stata LOG - CUT HERE
And, if I then type in Stata
xcontract test disease ntneg spec nfneg fneg nfpos fpos ntpos sens if method==1, list(, sepby(test))
then (as I have the SSC package -xcontract- installed) the result is:
**** BEGINNING OF Stata LOG - CUT HERE
Listing of results:
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| test disease ntneg spec nfneg fneg nfpos fpos ntpos sens _freq _percent |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 0 0 0 0 0 0 258 1 249 1 46 9.07 |
2. | 0 1 0 0 0 0 258 1 249 1 121 23.87 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
3. | 1 0 46 .17829457 121 .48594378 212 .82170543 128 .51405622 212 41.81 |
4. | 1 1 46 .17829457 121 .48594378 212 .82170543 128 .51405622 128 25.25 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
**** END OF Stata LOG - CUT HERE
The frequencies (_freq) given by the -xcontract- command are the same as the table cell numbers. And the sensitivities, specificities, false positive rates and true positive rates are equal, at each value of -test-, to those that would be observed if that value of -test- was the threshold value, and if a result is considered positive if and only if the test result is at OR above that value. (As specified by -help senspec- under the -posif()- option.) So what exactly is your query
Roger B Newson BSc MSc DPhil
Lecturer in Medical Statistics
Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health Group
National Heart and Lung Institute
Imperial College London
Royal Brompton Campus
Room 33, Emmanuel Kaye Building
1B Manresa Road
London SW3 6LR
UNITED KINGDOM
Tel: +44 (0)20 7352 8121 ext 3381
Fax: +44 (0)20 7351 8322
Email: [email protected]
Web page: http://www.imperial.ac.uk/nhli/r.newson/
Departmental Web page:
http://www1.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/about/divisions/nhli/respiration/popgenetics/reph/
Opinions expressed are those of the author, not of the institution.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael McCulloch
Sent: 10 November 2009 20:46
To: Statalist Statalist
Subject: st: -senspec- interpretation question
Dear Statalist folks,
I'd like to ask advice on interpreting the output of -senspec-. I've
created the following simple simulation example which allows me to
compare the -senspec- output to a simple 2x2 table. The following code
shows that the absolute numbers from -senspec- agrees with each cell
of my 2x2 table, but the frequency values are different. Am I
misinterpreting or mis-applying -senspec-?
clear
set obs 1000
set seed 12358
gen test=1 + int(2*uniform())
replace test=0 if test==2
replace test=1 in 1/300
gen disease=0 in 1/500
replace disease=1 in 501/1000
tab test disease, row
gen method=1 + int(2*uniform())
bysort method: tab test disease, row
tab test disease if method==1, row
senspec disease test if method==1, se(sens) spe(spec) fpos(fpos)
ntneg(ntneg) fneg(fneg) ntpos(ntpos) nfpos(nfpos) nfneg(nfneg)
* cellA: ntneg sp cellB: nfneg fneg cellC: nfpos fpos cellD:
ntpos se
list test disease ntneg spec nfneg fneg nfpos fpos ntpos sens in 1/10
Thank you kindly.
Michael McCulloch
Pine Street Foundation
124 Pine Street
San Anselmo, CA 94960-2674
tel: 415-407-1357
fax: 206-338-2391
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/