[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: How to deal with autocorrelation after running a Heckman

From	Austin Nichols <[email protected]>
To	[email protected]
Subject	Re: st: How to deal with autocorrelation after running a Heckman
Date	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:31:14 -0500

Steven D. Roper <[email protected]> :
Cluster by panel; see help vce_option

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Steven D. Roper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all. Sorry about a second post on this subject. I just ran a Wooldridge
> test for autocorrelation indicating that I have a problem with the panel
> data that I am using with a two-step Heckman. What remedies are there now
> for dealing with the auto correlation?
>
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: st: How to deal with autocorrelation after running a Heckman
  - From: Austin Nichols <[email protected]>

References:
- st: How to deal with autocorrelation after running a Heckman
  - From: "Steven D. Roper" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: st: AW: t-test using analytic weights
Next by Date: st: Panel Fixed(random) effects model with autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity
Previous by thread: st: How to deal with autocorrelation after running a Heckman
Next by thread: Re: st: How to deal with autocorrelation after running a Heckman
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread