Dear Sergiy:
The output was much nicer and simpler:
Predicted signs Logit on the universe
Coefficients z p
Sales + 0.531 30.869 0.000
Return - -0.731 -4.702 0.000
Growth opportunities + 0.159 7.920 0.000
Leverage - -1.227 -11.176 0.000
Cross listing + 1.138 10.862 0.000
Industry effects Included
Year effects Included
Country effects Included
Constant -0.674 -0.980 0.327
Number of observations 12900
Chi square 2175.230
p(chi2) 0
Pseudo R-square 0.238
Nagelkerke R-square 0.374
Pct classified in sample 74.512
I cannot use the new output.
Best regards
Herve
>>> Sergiy Radyakin <[email protected]> 02/11/09 20:35 >>>
Dear Herve,
If I understand correctly, there should be no dots (missings?). Note
they are all in the places where rownames contain a dot. Otherwise,
what was the corresponding output in Stata 10?
I guess it would be right to blame the new feature of Stata 11 called
"Factor variables" that causes some confusion in the older
user-written commands.
See: [U] 11.4.3 Factor variables
The correction is needed in estout, though.
Best regards, Sergiy Radyakin
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Herve STOLOWY <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Statalisters:
>
> I have the following syntax created with Stata 10 and using -estout- (downloadable from SSC).
>
> xi:logit english ln_sales roa_w growth_op2_w leverage_w listing i.sic2 i.year i.country if sample_universe==1, robust nolog
>
> estimates store m1, title(Logit on the universe)
>
> estadd estatclass: m1
> estadd nagelkerke: m1
> estadd scalar cons = _b[_cons]: m1
> estadd scalar cons_t = _b[_cons]/_se[_cons]: m1
> estadd scalar cons_p = (1-normal(abs(_b[_cons]/_se[_cons]))) * 2: m1
>
> estout m1 using Table4, replace cells ("b(fmt(%9.3f) label(Coefficients)) t(fmt(%9.3f) label(z)) p(fmt(%9.3f))") stats (cons cons_t cons_p N chi2 p r2_p nagelkerke p_corr, layout("@ @ @") fmt(3 3 3 0 3 0 3 3 3) labels("Constant" "Number of observations" "Chi square" "p(chi2)" "Pseudo R-square" "Nagelkerke R-square" "Pct classified in sample")) label labcol2( + - + - +, title(Predicted signs)) indicate("Industry effects = _Isic2*" "Year effects = _Iyear*" "Country effects = _Icountry*" , labels("Included" "Not included" )) drop(_cons) type
>
> It used to work perfectly.
>
> I have installed Stata 11 today and I now get very strange results (sorry to copy them):
>
> Predicted signs Logit on the universe
> Coefficients z p
> english
> ln_sales + 0.531 30.813 0.000
> roa_w - -0.722 -4.639 0.000
> growth_op2_w + 0.161 7.981 0.000
> leverage_w - -1.222 -11.122 0.000
> English cross listing + 1.128 10.733 0.000
> o.sic2==12 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==41 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==74 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==81 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==83 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==84 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==85 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==91 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==92 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==94 0.000 . .
> o.sic2==97 0.000 . .
> o.country==BRA 0.000 . .
> o.country==CAN 0.000 . .
> o.country==CHL 0.000 . .
> o.country==CIV 0.000 . .
> o.country==CYM 0.000 . .
> o.country==CYP 0.000 . .
> o.country==CZE 0.000 . .
> o.country==HRV 0.000 . .
> o.country==ISR 0.000 . .
> o.country==JOR 0.000 . .
> o.country==LBR 0.000 . .
> o.country==LTU 0.000 . .
> o.country==MHL 0.000 . .
> o.country==MYS 0.000 . .
> o.country==PER 0.000 . .
> o.country==REU 0.000 . .
> o.country==ROM 0.000 . .
> o.country==ROU 0.000 . .
> o.country==SAU 0.000 . .
> o.country==SRB 0.000 . .
> o.country==SVK 0.000 . .
> o.country==THA 0.000 . .
> o.country==TUN 0.000 . .
> o.country==TWN 0.000 . .
> o.country==VGB 0.000 . .
> o.country==VIR 0.000 . .
> o.country==VNM 0.000 . .
> o.country==ZAF 0.000 . .
> Industry effects Included
> Year effects Included
> Country effects Included
> Constant -0.763 -1.071 0.284
> Number of observations 12871
> Chi square 2171.490
> p(chi2) 0
> Pseudo R-square 0.238
> Nagelkerke R-square 0.374
> Pct classified in sample 74.540
> (output written to Table4)
>
> I did not have time to investigate all the changes in Stata 11.
>
> Would you have any idea?
>
> Best regards
>
> Herve Stolowy
>
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
