<>
And heed all the warnings that [MI], p. 72, conveys regarding the -post-
option. I take it from the text that if all you do afterwards is transfer
your estimation results via -outreg2-, you should be fine...
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Martin Weiss
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. November 2009 21:30
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: AW: equivalent to outreg2 when using mi estimate in Stata 11
<>
Use the -post- option for -mi estimate-:
*************
webuse mheart1s20, clear
mi estimate, dots post: reg attack smokes age bmi hsgrad female
outreg2 using word.doc
*************
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Clara Barata
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. November 2009 21:17
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: equivalent to outreg2 when using mi estimate in Stata 11
Hi!
I was wondering if there was some way to convert regression output
into a standard table when using mi estimate commands in stata 11.
When i fit a regression model using mi estimate followed by an outreg2
statement, I get the following message: matrix e(b) not found; run
regression first
r(111);
example:
mi estimate: regress ouctome predictor1 predictor2 , vce(cluster
Cluster_name)
outreg2 predictor using word.doc, bdec(3) addstat ("ICC",e(rho))
alpha(.001, .01, .05, .10) symbol(***, **, *, ~) replace
matrix e(b) not found; run regression first
r(111);
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
