Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: RE: ivregress with cointegrated variables


From   "Podesta', Federico" <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: RE: ivregress with cointegrated variables
Date   Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:08:43 +0200

Many thanks Judith 

Could you clarify you answer of course?

Best
F 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Abrams, Judith
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: ivregress with cointegrated variables
> 
> Of course.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Podesta',
> Federico
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: ivregress with cointegrated variables
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I am using a panel dataset composed by 16 units observed over 21 time
> points. all variables measured as levels are affected by the
> non-stationarity problem. Accordingly, I have adopted mean group
> estimator (via xtpmg Stata module) for testing for co-integration. In
> particular I have used the following STATA syntax:
> 
> xtpmg d.y d.x1 d.x2, ec(ec) lr(l.y l.x1 l.x2) replace 
> 
> My results reveal that the variables tend to return to a long-run
> equilibrium. Nevertheless, x2 appears as a endogenous variable.
> Consequently. I would like to use IV estimator. However no 
> Stata command
> allows to estimate IV regression with panel integrated processes.
> Consequently, I mean to run IV regression in a repeated cross-section
> framework. In particular I would use the following syntax
> 
> bys year: ivregress y x2 (x1= x3)
> 
> but I wonder whether it is correct estimate such repeated 
> cross-section
> models when we have already obtained evidence about cointegration. In
> other words can I test for cointegration without use IV estimator, on
> the one hand, and estimate IV repeated cross-section models, on the
> other hand?
>    
> Thanks a lot in adavance for any your hel 
> 
> Best 
> Federico 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 
> 
> -----------
> Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any 
> attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
> and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
> If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, unauthorized review, use, 
> disclosure or distribution of this email and any materials 
> contained in any attachments is prohibited. If you receive 
> this message in error, or are not the intended recipient(s), 
> please immediately notify the sender by email and destroy all 
> copies of the original message, including attachments.
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index