|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Problem with -estat endogenous- after -ivregress gmm- with time-series operators
From |
Michael Hanson <[email protected]> |
To |
[email protected] |
Subject |
Re: st: Problem with -estat endogenous- after -ivregress gmm- with time-series operators |
Date |
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:51:35 -0400 |
On Jun 26, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Brian P. Poi wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Michael Hanson wrote:
As the subject might give away, I believe I have found an obscure
bug (a term I don't use lightly) with -estat endogenous- following
an -ivregress gmm- estimation in which one or more of the variables
in the estimation use Stata's time series operators. Below is a
stylized estimation problem (based loosely on Campbell & Mankiw,
1989, for the curious) that exhibits the apparent bug.
...
With the announcement of Stata 11 in a month or so, I'm still
hoping this issue will be fixed in an update to Stata 10.
This is a bug in the Stata 10 version of -ivregress-, and it will be
fixed in a forthcoming ado-file update.
Incidentally, Stata 11 does not have this problem. In Stata 11, the
Mata functions st_data() and st_view() allow you to specify time-
series-
operated variables and factor variables directly without having to
use a utility beforehand to create temporary variables.
Thanks for that information, Brian, both regarding Stata 10 and Stata
11. Much appreciated.
Best,
Mike
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/