st: Re: computing expected values for GLM with nbreg

["Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>]

<>

-help glm postestimation- contains the syntax for -predict- which does give 
you expected values...



HTH
Martin
_______________________
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <abelmore@purdue.edu>
To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:20 AM
Subject: st: computing expected values for GLM with nbreg


> Hello,
>
> I am running a negative binomial model - because my data are time series I
> switched to running the model through the GLM command so I could control 
> for
> autocorrelation and heterosk. w/ HAC variance estimates. I want to compute
> expected values to make the interpretation a little more tranparent. When 
> using
> the nbreg command previously I used clarify to get expected values. 
> Clarify
> won't run after GLM, and looking through STATA help I see no 
> postestimation
> command for getting expected values. Does anyone know how I might go about
> getting expected values through STATA with this set up -- would I be 
> better of
> doing hand calculations?
>
> Thanks for any help,
> Ashlie Delshad
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/