Works like a charm!!Thanks a lot!
should have asked earlier I guess! ;)
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Martin Weiss<[email protected]> wrote:
> <>
>
>
> ********
> capt ssc inst estout
>
> sysuse auto, clear
>
> local vars /*
> */ "pri mpg turn for disp tr tu"
>
> pwcorr `vars' ,/*
> */ star(.1) bon
>
> qui estpost correlate `vars', /*
> */ matrix
>
> esttab ., not unstack/*
> */ compress noobs /*
> */ star(* 0.10 ** 0.05 *** 0.01)
> ********
>
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Christian Weiss
> Gesendet: Montag, 8. Juni 2009 21:53
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: st: pwcorr with more than one "star-level"
>
> Hello!
>
> I guess I just created my 100 correlation table with several
> variables. So far, I used pwcorr with the "star" option, first with
> star(.1), than with star(.05) and lastly with star(.01), combined the
> results.Although this works perfectly, it always takes some time to
> manual combine the results for the different significance levels.
>
> Is there any way to realize a pwcorr with different "star" levels, so
> that the output marks .1 with *, .05 with ** and .01 with ***?
>
> Best regards
> Christian
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
