|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: fitting a gompertz curve, not in the context of survival analysis
From |
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]> |
To |
<[email protected]> |
Subject |
st: RE: fitting a gompertz curve, not in the context of survival analysis |
Date |
Fri, 29 May 2009 11:20:52 +0100 |
In addition to other comments:
I'd be interested to know the Laird reference implied but not given
here.
I don't know of an add-on, but no matter: you shouldn't need one. An
easy alternative should be to try -nl- with the equation specified on
the command line.
But I'm puzzled by your intent on various levels.
1. Growth models in biology and elsewhere that I know about presuppose a
natural time origin, i.e. a date of birth or creation. It's not obvious
to me from the rudimentary economics I know that there is an equivalent
for your problem.
2. Otherwise put, this curve goes X(0) at time 0, but why is one data
point privileged over the others?
Nick
[email protected]
Dan Waldo
I am trying to test whether government revenues as a percentage of GDP
can be fit over time with a Gompertz curve -- especially to determine
(if the fit is appropriate) the limiting value.
The help I have found comes in the form of survival analysis models,
which I have trouble reconciling to the model I am trying to fit.
Is there a Stata add-on that fits Laird's tumor-growth variant of the
Gompertz? This would be specified as:
X(t)= K exp(log(X(0)/K)exp(-at))
where X is known and K and a are estimated.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/