|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: dropped interaction term in post hoc probing of significant moderation effect using svy regress
From |
Ishtar Govia <[email protected]> |
To |
[email protected] |
Subject |
st: dropped interaction term in post hoc probing of significant moderation effect using svy regress |
Date |
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:12:59 -0500 |
Dear List,
I am using Stata 10/SE 10.1 for Macs. I have a question concerning a
dropped interaction term. I am using survey data so I use the -svy-
commands
I am doing post hoc probing of a significant interaction effect using
the Aiken & West 1991 simple slopes method, as delineated in Holmbeck
2002. I created a two new conditional variables based on the centered
moderator (high and low emotional support, variables hiemotspfm and
loemotspfm respectively) and then computed interactions of each of
those new conditional variables with the independent variable (the
variable for the interaction with the high emotional support and IV
interaction below is called hiemot_subtle). I then attempted to run 2
post-hoc multiple linear regressions, each including the IV main
effect, one of the conditional variables, and the interaction of the
IV and conditional moderator variable.
However, I was stumped in running the first of those two post hoc
regressions. When I ran the following, however, the interaction term
was dropped. I have tried to run the regression with only the new
conditional moderator main effect and it works. However, when I try to
run the regression with only the interaction between the new
conditional moderator and the IV main effect, it still drops the
interaction. Does anyone have any ideas why this might have occurred,
and more importantly if/how I can make the regression run without
having the interaction dropped?
Thanks for your consideration,
Ishtar Govia
[email protected]
. svy, subpop (s2subpop): regress log_kessler6_sum age female hhinc
forgnbrn haitian sepdivwid nevmarr otherstate outofusa C_subtle_avg
hiemotspfm hiemot_subtle if !missing(age, female, hhinc, forgnbrn,
haitian, sepdivwid, nevmarr, otherstate, outofusa, C_subtle_avg,
C_emotspfm, subtle_emot)
(running regress on estimation sample)
Survey: Linear regression
Number of strata = 19 Number of obs
= 550
Number of PSUs = 44 Population size =
64.977893
Subpop. no. of obs
= 550
Subpop. size =
64.977893
Design df
= 25
F( 11, 15)
= .
Prob > F
= .
R-squared
= 0.2971
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Linearized
log_kessle~m | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------
+----------------------------------------------------------------
age | -.0012483 .0018973 -0.66 0.517 -.
0051559 .0026592
female | -.1549944 .0492037 -3.15 0.004 -.2563314
-.0536575
hhinc | -1.88e-06 6.11e-07 -3.08 0.005 -3.14e-06
-6.22e-07
forgnbrn | -.0346815 .0702836 -0.49 0.626 -.
1794334 .1100703
haitian | .0294622 .0609838 0.48 0.633 -.
0961362 .1550606
sepdivwid | .1145513 .0839624 1.36 0.185 -.
0583725 .287475
nevmarr | .1836943 .0487229 3.77 0.001 .
0833476 .284041
otherstate | -.0144171 .0655521 -0.22 0.828 -.
1494241 .1205899
outofusa | .0085318 .0553012 0.15 0.879 -.
1053631 .1224266
C_subtle_avg | .1138018 .0358374 3.18 0.004 .0399933 .
1876103
hiemotspfm | -.0892076 .0468532 -1.90 0.068 -.
1857036 .0072884
hiemot_sub~e | (dropped)
_cons | 2.25171 .1138259 19.78 0.000 2.017281
2.486139
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/