--- On Mon, 23/3/09, [email protected] wrote:
> Thanks again for your reply, but I do not think the problem
> I have with nlcom has anything to do with the missing
> standard errors. As the examples below show, slightly
> modifying the nonlinear expression of the marginal effect
> (changing the exponent of _b[/Umi]), and using exactly the
> same parameters as before, produces sensible results.
I think that the problem is that -nlcom- should not have given
you any results when you feed it a wrong model, like a model
with missing values on some standard errors.
-- Maarten
-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/