<>
Is it not weird, though, that the -nocons- option is not trapped by -dprobit- before it even starts its iterations? -set trace on- shows that it stops quite late...
How strong a case is there for the continued existence of -dprobit-? Somehow, it creates more problems than it solves...
HTH
Martin
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:29:06 +0000 (GMT)
> Von: Maarten buis <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: st: dprobit/nocons/mfx question
>
> --- On Thu, 19/3/09, Schaffer, Mark E wrote:
> > Does anyone know why -dprobit- doesn't allow -nocons-?
>
> I don't know why this is, but it is consistent with the
> documentation of -dprobit-, as the -nocons- option is
> not in the list of "dprobit_options". I guess that since
> -mfx- was developed, the further development of the
> -dprobit- command has had low priority.
>
> -- Maarten
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Institut fuer Soziologie
> Universitaet Tuebingen
> Wilhelmstrasse 36
> 72074 Tuebingen
> Germany
>
> http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
> -----------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Martin Weiss
Hackersteigle 3
72076 Tübingen
00497071/793535
00491784597218
Aufgepasst: Sind Ihre Daten beim Online-Banking auch optimal geschützt?
Jetzt absichern: https://homebanking.gmx.net/[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
